The Lucent Accounting Scandal

            
 
Case Studies | Case Study in Business, Management, Operations, Strategy, Case Study

ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection

Case Details:

Case Code : FINC039
Case Length : 14 Pages
Period : 1999 - 2004
Pub. Date : 2005
Teaching Note :Not Available
Organization : Lucent
Industry : Telecom
Countries : USA

To download The Lucent Accounting Scandal case study (Case Code: FINC039) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:

Finance | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Ethics, Case Studies

Price:

For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 400;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 400 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra
» Finance Case Studies
» Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case
» Business Case Studies
» Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company

Custom Search



Please note:

This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.



Chat with us

Strategic Management Formulation, Implementation, & Control, 12e

Please leave your feedback

Leave Your Feedback

ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India RSS Feed

<< Previous

Excerpts Contd...

The Result

Lucent and three individual defendants - William Plunkett, Deborah Harris and Vanessa Petrini - agreed to settle matters without admitting or denying the SEC allegations. In March 2004, Lucent agreed to pay a $25 mn fine, the largest fine ever levied by SEC against a company for refusing to co-operate.

SEC claimed that Lucent had failed to cooperate in its regulatory investigations. In addition, SEC claimed that Lucent's officials made statements that misled the public about its investigation. Apart from paying the fine, Lucent consented to the SEC judgement that charged it with violations of federal securities laws, poor internal control provisions & reporting and improper maintainance of books and records. Plunkett, Harris and Petrini too consented to a similar judgment and also to knowingly circumventing internal controls of the SEC and aiding and abetting violations of provisions of reporting, books and records and internal controls laid out in the federal securities laws (Refer Exhibit IV for relevant sections of the Securities Exchange Act, 1934 dealing with the said offenses)...

Finance | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Finance, Case Studies

Exhibits

Exhibit I: Lucent's Stock Performance
Exhibit II: Lucent - Financial Statements (1999-2000)
Exhibit III: Lucent's Executives Involved in Accounting Fraud
Exhibit IV: Relevant Provisions of the Securities Exchange Act (1934)
Exhibit V: Lucent - Financial Statements (2001-03)


Custom Search



Marketing Financial Products
Textbooks Collection

Case Studies in Finance Vol III

Case Studies in Finance Vol III
e-Book on Case Studies in Finance

Case Study Volumes Collection

 

Case Studies Links:- Case Studies, Short Case Studies, Simplified Case Studies.

Other Case Studies:- Multimedia Case Studies, Cases in Other Languages.

Business Reports Link:- Business Reports.

Books:- Textbooks, Work Books, Case Study Volumes.